Boren Clay Products Company v. National Labor Relations Board

419 F.2d 385, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2207, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11293
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 1970
Docket13361_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 419 F.2d 385 (Boren Clay Products Company v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boren Clay Products Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 419 F.2d 385, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2207, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11293 (4th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board found that the Company violated 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (5) of the National Labor Relations Act.

First, the 8(a) (1) charge, that the Company was “engaged in conduct clearly designed to intimidate and coerce its employees into repudiating the Union,” is amply supported by the evidence. Foremen, on more than one occasion, made decidedly coercive, and *386 hence illegal, statements to employees about the Union and their participation in it. Worse yet, Company officials figured prominently in the encouragement and solicitation of signatures for a de-certification petition.

Second, the Company violated 8 (a) (5) when it ceased negotiating with the certified Union as soon as a decertification petition was filed on behalf of certain employees. The Company does not contest the Union’s majority and admits that it has never doubted the Union’s strength. Its sole contention is that when some employees file a decertification petition, the Board may not insist that the Company display good faith. Clearly, this position is not in accordance with the law. See NLRB v. Rish Equipment Co., 407 F.2d 1098, 1100-1101 (4th Cir. 1969).

Enforcement granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 F.2d 385, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2207, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boren-clay-products-company-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca4-1970.