Borell's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Borell's Estate

100 A. 953, 256 Pa. 523, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 650

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 19, 1917·No. Appeal, 226·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is dismissed on the following from the opinion of the adjudicating judge, confirmed by the court in banc, refusing to surcharge the accountant: “In the light of all the testimony the auditing judge is of the opinion that the accountant acted.in this matter with common skill, prudence and caution, and properly exer *526 cised the discretion given it by the testator, and therefore should not be surcharged.”

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This appeal is dismissed on the following from the opinion of the adjudicating judge, confirmed by the court in banc, refusing to surcharge the accountant: “In the light of all the testimony the auditing judge is of the opinion that the accountant acted.in this matter with common skill, prudence and caution, and properly exer *526 cised the discretion given it by the testator, and therefore should not be surcharged.”

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Borell's Estate, 100 A. 953, 256 Pa. 523, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 650 (Pa. 1917).

Pincite

100 A. 953 (Borell's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related