Borders v. Hartman

814 S.W.2d 389, 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 739, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 93, 1991 WL 105554
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJune 19, 1991
DocketNo. D-0639
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 814 S.W.2d 389 (Borders v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borders v. Hartman, 814 S.W.2d 389, 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 739, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 93, 1991 WL 105554 (Tex. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this original mandamus proceeding relator seeks review of the propriety of sanctions imposed by respondent for abuse of discovery. We believe that the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the rulings of which relator complains in this proceeding in light of our opinions today in TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.1991). Accordingly, we deny this petition for mandamus as having been improvidently granted and vacate our order staying proceedings, without addressing the merits of the petition and without prejudice to relators again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in Re State Farm Lloyds
520 S.W.3d 595 (Texas Supreme Court, 2017)
Lassiter v. Shavor
824 S.W.2d 667 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
814 S.W.2d 389, 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 739, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 93, 1991 WL 105554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borders-v-hartman-tex-1991.