Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 374
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Border Brokerage Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 179 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 3, 1960·No. No. 63915; protest 58/10122 (Seattle)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Border Brokerage Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 374 (cusc 1960).
44 Cust. Ct. 374 (Border Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tower v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 36 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)