Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 608
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Border Brokerage Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 179 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 21, 1959·No. Reap. Dec. 9396; Entry No. C 05-128, etc.·Published
Opinion
This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:
Me. Glad : I offer to stipulate that the merchandise involved in this appeal to reappraisement consists of “gearmatie transmission parts.” I also offer to stipulate that at the time of the exportation of this merchandise there was no foreign, export, or United States value as defined by section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930. I also offer to stipulate that the cost of production figure of this merchandise during the period of exportation was the unit invoice value less 30 percent, packing included.
Me. Stclaeqef : Upon information obtained from Mr. Monroe, appraiser at Blaine, the Government so stipulates.
On the agreed facts, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is the invoice unit value, less 30 per centum, packing included.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Border Brokerage Co. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 608 (cusc 1959).
42 Cust. Ct. 608 (Border Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Repealed. Pub. L. 96–39, title II, §201(b), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 201
19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)