Booth v. . Milliken
87 N.E. 1115, 194 N.Y. 553, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1370
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that whether the statute of Tennessee, where the land is situated, or the statute of Hew York, where the contract was made and where the action is brought, be applicable to the case, no action is maintainable for the reason that the contract is fatally defective in failing to designate the land agreed to be sold; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Booth v. . Milliken, 87 N.E. 1115, 194 N.Y. 553, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1370 (N.Y. 1909).
87 N.E. 1115 (Booth v. . Milliken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Knight v. Carter
1 Misc. 2d 351 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Silberstein v. Murdoch
216 A.D. 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
McDaniel v. Daves
123 S.E. 663 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1924)
Moss v. King
65 So. 180 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)
Security Title & Trust Co. v. Stewart
154 A.D. 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
McCulloch v. Bauer
139 N.W. 318 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)
White v. Allen Kingston Motor Car Co.
69 Misc. 627 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Booth v. . Milliken
88 N.E. 1120 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)