Booth v. . Milliken

New York Court of Appeals

Booth v. . Milliken

87 N.E. 1115, 194 N.Y. 553, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1370

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 26, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 87 N.E. 1115 (Booth v. . Milliken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Booth v. . Milliken, 87 N.E. 1115, 194 N.Y. 553, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1370 (N.Y. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that whether the statute of Tennessee, where the land is situated, or the statute of Hew York, where the contract was made and where the action is brought, be applicable to the case, no action is maintainable for the reason that the contract is fatally defective in failing to designate the land agreed to be sold; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that whether the statute of Tennessee, where the land is situated, or the statute of Hew York, where the contract was made and where the action is brought, be applicable to the case, no action is maintainable for the reason that the contract is fatally defective in failing to designate the land agreed to be sold; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 N.E. 1115, 194 N.Y. 553, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booth-v-milliken-ny-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack