Booth v. Flanagan
This text of 584 A.2d 1191 (Booth v. Flanagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 579, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“What effect should a mortgage contingency clause, that does not comply with General Statutes § 49-5b, have where the buyers have waived the terms of the clause and are ready, willing and able to purchase the property without third party mortgage financing?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
584 A.2d 1191, 217 Conn. 807, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booth-v-flanagan-conn-1991.