Bonvicino v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bonvicino v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund

303 A.D.2d 184, 755 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2218

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 2003·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered July 26, 2002, [185] which denied the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondent Board of Trustees denying petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The determination by respondent Medical Board that petitioner was fully able to perform police duties at the time of his application for accident disability retirement benefits was based on the Medical Board’s numerous examinations of petitioner and its reviews of petitioner’s medical reports and objective test results. Since the Medical Board’s determination was based on at least some credible evidence, the ensuing determination of respondent Board of Trustees denying petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits may not be judicially disturbed (see Matter of Bansley v Safir, 299 AD2d 185 [2002]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Williams and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered July 26, 2002, [185] which denied the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondent Board of Trustees denying petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The determination by respondent Medical Board that petitioner was fully able to perform police duties at the time of his application for accident disability retirement benefits was based on the Medical Board’s numerous examinations of petitioner and its reviews of petitioner’s medical reports and objective test results. Since the Medical Board’s determination was based on at least some credible evidence, the ensuing determination of respondent Board of Trustees denying petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits may not be judicially disturbed (see Matter of Bansley v Safir, 299 AD2d 185 [2002]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Williams and Friedman, JJ.

Bonvicino v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund, 303 A.D.2d 184, 755 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

303 A.D.2d 184 (Bonvicino v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related