Bansley v. Safir
This text of 299 A.D.2d 185 (Bansley v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered April 4, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondent Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund denying petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The determination by respondent Medical Board of the Police Pension Fund, that the petitioner was not disabled for police duty at the time of his retirement, but rather that his condition had deteriorated after his retirement, was based on the Medical Board’s numerous examinations of petitioner and its reviews of petitioner’s medical reports and objective test results. Although the petitioner’s surgeon and one member of the Medical Board had a contrary interpretation of petitioner’s injury — viewing it as one that had progressed over time due to a preretirement accident — the determination of the Medical Board majority was nonetheless based on at least some credible evidence. Accordingly, neither that determination nor the consequent determination of respondent Board of Trustees denying petitioner accident disability retirement benefits may be judicially disturbed (see Matter of Borenstein v New York [186]*186City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760-761). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 A.D.2d 185, 748 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bansley-v-safir-nyappdiv-2002.