Bonner v. State
717 So. 2d 600, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11515, 1998 WL 597869
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bonner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3878 →
Opinion
We affirm the denial of appellant’s Motion to Correct Sentence without prejudice to allow appellant to seek the appropriate remedy. See, e.g., Green v. State, 698 So.2d 575 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Slay v. Singletary, 676 So.2d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)(en banc), aff'd, 688 So.2d 319 (Fla.1997); Duggan v. Department of Corrections, 665 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bonner v. State, 717 So. 2d 600, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11515, 1998 WL 597869 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
717 So. 2d 600 (Bonner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Singletary v. Slay
688 So. 2d 319 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Green v. State
698 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Slay v. Singletary
676 So. 2d 456 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Duggan v. Department of Corrections
665 So. 2d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)