Bonner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bonner v. State

709 So. 2d 131, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2315, 1998 WL 267953

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 1998

DocketNo. 97-05008

StatusPublished

This text of 709 So. 2d 131 (Bonner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonner v. State, 709 So. 2d 131, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2315, 1998 WL 267953 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Norman Bonner challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for posteonviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm on all issues assailing the effectiveness of trial counsel without discussion. Bonner also alleged in his motion that his sentence is illegal under the dictates of Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993). The trial court found that the claim was untimely and denied it. Bonner has received relief on this claim in a proceeding alleging ineffectiveness of appel[132]*132late counsel in this court’s case number 98-00272. Accordingly, we affirm that portion of his summary appeal as well because it is now moot.

Affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Norman Bonner challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for posteonviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm on all issues assailing the effectiveness of trial counsel without discussion. Bonner also alleged in his motion that his sentence is illegal under the dictates of Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993). The trial court found that the claim was untimely and denied it. Bonner has received relief on this claim in a proceeding alleging ineffectiveness of appel[132]*132late counsel in this court’s case number 98-00272. Accordingly, we affirm that portion of his summary appeal as well because it is now moot.

Affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

709 So. 2d 131, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2315, 1998 WL 267953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonner-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack