Bonfiglio v. American Vehicle Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bonfiglio v. American Vehicle Insurance Co.

680 So. 2d 1100, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10497, 1996 WL 577498

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 9, 1996

DocketNo. 96-1495

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 680 So. 2d 1100 (Bonfiglio v. American Vehicle Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonfiglio v. American Vehicle Insurance Co., 680 So. 2d 1100, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10497, 1996 WL 577498 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A PIP claimant seeks review of a circuit court, appellate division per curiam affir-mance of county court orders denying him attorney’s fees and costs and requiring arbitration. The merits of the appeal were for the circuit court to determine. We are convinced that its decision (either way) cannot be said to embody a “legal [error] serious enough to constitute a departure from the essential requirements of law,” Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93, 95 (Fla.1983), so as to permit our review on certiorari and thus, in effect, grant the petitioner a forbidden second appeal. Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523 (Fla.1995); Combs, 436 So.2d at 93; Rich v. Fisher, 655 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A PIP claimant seeks review of a circuit court, appellate division per curiam affir-mance of county court orders denying him attorney’s fees and costs and requiring arbitration. The merits of the appeal were for the circuit court to determine. We are convinced that its decision (either way) cannot be said to embody a “legal [error] serious enough to constitute a departure from the essential requirements of law,” Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93, 95 (Fla.1983), so as to permit our review on certiorari and thus, in effect, grant the petitioner a forbidden second appeal. Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523 (Fla.1995); Combs, 436 So.2d at 93; Rich v. Fisher, 655 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Certiorari denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

680 So. 2d 1100, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10497, 1996 WL 577498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonfiglio-v-american-vehicle-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack