Bond v. The Cora

3 F. Cas. 835, 2 Pet. Adm. 361
CourtDistrict Court, D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1806
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 F. Cas. 835 (Bond v. The Cora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bond v. The Cora, 3 F. Cas. 835, 2 Pet. Adm. 361 (pennsylvaniad 1806).

Opinion

Libel; “To the Honourable Richard Peters, Judge of the District Court of the United States for the District of Pennsylvania. Phineas Bond, Esq., his Britannic majesty’s consul-general for the middle and southern states of America, with all due respect shew-eth: That a certain British brig, of very considerable value, laden, as he is informed, with coffee and sugar and other articles, bound from Jamaica to London, hath been found at sea, deserted from necessity by her crew, and brought by certain persons to him unknown into the port at Philadelphia, and is now riding at anchor at the Lazaretto. That the said brig is, he believes, named the Cora, but he knoweth not to whom the said brig and cargo belong, but has reason to believe that they are the property of subjects of his Britannic majesty. On behalf of whom it may concern, he prays, that the said brig and cargo, may by the process of the district court, be taken into the custody of the marshal, and restored to the owner, or owners of the same, after payment of reasonable salvage to those who have brought the same into port, or that such other steps maybe taken in the premises as to your honour shall seem fit. P. Bond. Edw. Tilghman, Proctor.”

“The libel of Nathaniel L. and George Griswold of the city of New York, merchants, Bartlet Shepherd of the same place, sea captain, and of Dennison Wood, late mate, Andrew Eddy, Thomas Ferris, John Brown, and Joseph Chaplis, seamen, and Joseph Lawrence, cook of the brig Ceres of New York, respectfully sets forth: That your libellants, the said Nathaniel L. and George Griswold, are the owners of a certain brig called the Ceres, of which the said Bart-let Shepherd is master, and the said Den-nison Wood, mate, the said Andrew Eddy, Thomas Ferris, John Brown and Joseph Chaplis, seamen, and the said Joseph Lawrence, cook, which said brig Ceres, on her return voyage from Havanna, loaded with sugars, &c. and destined for New York, viz. on or about the twenty-sixth day of August last, on the high seas, in latitude 32, and longitude 77%, W. of London, fell in with a certain brig or vessel, called as your libel-lants believe ‘The Cora,’ altogether deserted and derelict, with five feet water in the hold of the said brig, and with her rigging very much shattered and Injured. Whereupon your libellants, the said Bartlet Shepherd, Dennison Wood and others the crew of the [836]*836said brig Ceres toot possession of the said brig Cora; and after much difficulty and danger, and with the exposure of their lives and of the loss of the said brig Ceres, the said Cora was pumped out by some of the crew of the said brig Ceres and taken in tow by the said brig Ceres, and by her drawn towards land. That by order of your libellants the said Bartlet Shepherd, the said Dennison Wood, Andrew Eddy, and Thomas Ferris went on board of the said brig Cora, and have continued on board of her unto this time. That on or about the third day of September a violent squall came on which separated the said brig Ceres from the said brig Cora; and the said Dennison Wood and others on board the said Cora, in obedience to the orders they had received from the said Bartlet Shepherd, and as soon as the said squall had abated, by constant exertion, brought the said Cora into the port of Philadelphia, where they arrived on or about the fourteenth day of September. Tour libel-lants therefore pray, that the said brig Cora, her furniture, tackle, &c. together with her cargo, and every thing found on board of her, may be adjudged to them as deserted, derelict,2 and by reason of the premises, having become the property of your libellants, in such parts or portions as to this honourable court may seem proper, and according to the laws and regulations of the admiralty. Bichard Peters, Jun., Proctor for the Libel-lants.”

“The libel of Don Juan de Echevirria, a subject of his Catholic majesty, most respectfully sheweth: That your libellant is, and for many years now last past has been, a captain or master of ships and vessels in the merchant service of Spain, duly licensed and admitted according to the marine law and regulation of that country; and as such is skilled and experienced in the navigation and management of ships and vessels. That on the fifth of June now last past, your libel-lant was owner and master of a certain Spanish brigantine called the Felix, and being with his said vessel in the course of a voyage, he was on that day captured on the high seas by a British privateer, and carried with his said vessel into the island of Jamaica, where his person was released and he received a passport from the British government there to go to Batavano, in the island of Cuba, from whence he went to the port of the Havanna: that it being his intention to go from thence to Montevideo on the Spanish American continent, he shipped himself as a passenger at the Havanna aforesaid on board a certain American brig, called the Ceres, Bartlet Shepherd master, of the bur-then of one hundred and thirty-five tons, or thereabouts, bound to the port of New York, navigated by the said captain, his mate, and four seamen, making in all six persons, and there were no other persons on board, but the said six persons, the cook and your libellant, who was a passenger as aforesaid, and who agreed to pay to the said captain Shepherd, forty dollars, for the transportation of himself and his effects to New York. That they sailed from the Ha-vanna on the seventeenth of the said month, and continued their voyage until they were in thirty-three degrees north latitude, and sixty-three degrees west longitude, something more or less, when they saw a sail in the evening under a heavy squall, which did not appear to be taking any precautions to guard against it. That your libellant insisted upon it to Captain Shepherd, that there was nobody on board of the said vessel, on which he answered, that she might be a privateer, and that he did not want to go on board, the wind being favourable for continuing our navigation; that your libellant again represented to him that the said vessel had few or no people on board; on which, and on which only, he determined to speak her, which they did about seven o’clock in the evening, and after having hailed her several times, and nobody answering, it was thought proper to put out the long boat: that your libellant offered to go on board of the said vessel, but Captain Shepherd would not permit it, but sent his mate with two men on board of her, who informed us that she was entirely deserted by her crew, and that she made a great deal of water. The boat returned with two more men, in order to pump out the water; but after having pumped the pumps almost dry, it was found that she did not make any water at all; and in the mean time, your libellant and two other persons were the only ones who remained on board of the Ceres, took in reefs, and did the work of that vessel until near midnight, when the boat returned from the deserted vessel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duff v. Merritt
86 F. 675 (Second Circuit, 1898)
The Connemara
108 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Sinclair v. Cooper
108 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 F. Cas. 835, 2 Pet. Adm. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bond-v-the-cora-pennsylvaniad-1806.