Bond v. Garraghty

75 F. App'x 211
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 25, 2003·No. No. 03-6823·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Bond, a Virginia inmate, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bond has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bond v. Garraghty, 75 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2003).

75 F. App'x 211 (Bond v. Garraghty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)