Bomar v. Equitable Mortgage Co.
49 S.E. 267, 121 Ga. 466, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 195
Opinion
Where on the hearing of an application for a continuance on account of the illness of a party, the evidence introduced was of such a character as to authorize a finding that there had been “several” previous continuances granted the applicant for the same.cause, the judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling the motion to continue ; and this is true though there was no dispute as to the party’s illness and consequent inability to attend court. Stanford v. New England Mortgage Co., 110 Ga. 274, and cit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bomar v. Equitable Mortgage Co., 49 S.E. 267, 121 Ga. 466, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 195 (Ga. 1904).
49 S.E. 267 (Bomar v. Equitable Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Appling v. Tatum
670 S.E.2d 795 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Burch v. Atlantic Life Insurance
139 S.E. 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Heath v. Edwards
113 S.E. 46 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)