BOLTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

E.D. Pennsylvania

BOLTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided December 16, 2019·No. 5:18-cv-02254·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT P. BOLTZ, SR. : CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 18-2254 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al. : ORDER AND NOW, this 16 day of December 2019, upon considering the Petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 15), Respondent’s Answer (ECF Doc. No. 22), no timely reply, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. Mr. Boltz’s Petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 15) is DENIED with prejudice; 2. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability;! and, 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

' See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT P. BOLTZ, SR. : CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 18-2254 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al. : ORDER AND NOW, this 16 day of December 2019, upon considering the Petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 15), Respondent’s Answer (ECF Doc. No. 22), no timely reply, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. Mr. Boltz’s Petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 15) is DENIED with prejudice; 2. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability;! and, 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

' See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

BOLTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, (E.D. Pa. 2019).

Pincite

BOLTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA (BOLTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related