Bolton v. Rouss

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Bolton v. Rouss

80 So. 227, 144 La. 138, 1918 La. LEXIS 1712

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 2, 1918

DocketNo. 21675

StatusPublished

This text of 80 So. 227 (Bolton v. Rouss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolton v. Rouss, 80 So. 227, 144 La. 138, 1918 La. LEXIS 1712 (La. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

O’NIELL, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing her suit for want of a valid service of citation. The object of the suit was to have decreed null and void two transfers or assignments made by the plaintiff of insurance policies on the life of her husband, payable to her. The facts and issues presented are the same as in the case of the husband, George P. Bolton v. Peter W. Rouss et al., No. 21674, 80 South. 226, ante, p. 134, decided to-day.

Por the reasons given in that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing her suit for want of a valid service of citation. The object of the suit was to have decreed null and void two transfers or assignments made by the plaintiff of insurance policies on the life of her husband, payable to her. The facts and issues presented are the same as in the case of the husband, George P. Bolton v. Peter W. Rouss et al., No. 21674, 80 South. 226, ante, p. 134, decided to-day.

Por the reasons given in that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 So. 227, 144 La. 138, 1918 La. LEXIS 1712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolton-v-rouss-la-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack