Bolls v. Street

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2361

JONATHAN BOLLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

W. SCOTT STREET, III, Secretary of the Virginia Board of Examiners,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00550-REP)

Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Bolls, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Crooks Hill, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Bolls appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing Bolls’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction and denying

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Bolls v. Street, No. 3:10-cv-00550-REP

(E.D. Va. Nov. 5 & Dec. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED