Bolls v. Street
This text of Bolls v. Street (Bolls v. Street) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2361
JONATHAN BOLLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
W. SCOTT STREET, III, Secretary of the Virginia Board of Examiners,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00550-REP)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Bolls, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Crooks Hill, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Bolls appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing Bolls’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Bolls v. Street, No. 3:10-cv-00550-REP
(E.D. Va. Nov. 5 & Dec. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bolls v. Street, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolls-v-street-ca4-2011.