Bolling v. City of New York
This text of Bolling v. City of New York (Bolling v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THOMAS BOLLING, Plaintiff, 18 CIVIL 5406 (PGG)(RWL) -against- JUDGMENT THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, EMS, DETECTIVE SHANNON MEYERS, and POLICE OFFICER PETER CRANE, Defendants.
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 15, 2021, Plaintiff's objection is overruled, the R&R is adopted in its entirety, and Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed.
Dated: New York, New York March 15, 2021
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: K Ma. NGO Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bolling v. City of New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolling-v-city-of-new-york-nysd-2021.