Bolis v. Fitzpatrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bolis v. Fitzpatrick

35 A.D.3d 1153, 825 N.Y.S.2d 398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 2006

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 A.D.3d 1153 (Bolis v. Fitzpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolis v. Fitzpatrick, 35 A.D.3d 1153, 825 N.Y.S.2d 398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J), entered May 31, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict awarding damages for past and future pain and suffering and to increase those awards to $30,000 and $50,000, respectively, and granted that part of defendants’ motion seeking to reduce the award of damages for past medical expenses.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying plaintiffs motion and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Bolis v Fitzpatrick (35 AD3d 1153 [2006]). Present—Hurlbutt, A.P.J., Martoche, Centra and Fine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J), entered May 31, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict awarding damages for past and future pain and suffering and to increase those awards to $30,000 and $50,000, respectively, and granted that part of defendants’ motion seeking to reduce the award of damages for past medical expenses.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying plaintiffs motion and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Bolis v Fitzpatrick (35 AD3d 1153 [2006]). Present—Hurlbutt, A.P.J., Martoche, Centra and Fine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 A.D.3d 1153, 825 N.Y.S.2d 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolis-v-fitzpatrick-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack