Boler v. Malik

267 A.D.2d 998, 700 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13740
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1999·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

[999] that actual or constructive notice of the dangerous lead condition may be imputed to defendants because defendants were aware of chipping and peeling paint; defendants are both real estate brokers and landlords of other properties; defendant Paramjeet K. Malik is a registered nurse; and, before purchasing the subject property, she received mortgage documents for another property that referred to Federal lead based paint regulations (see, Smith v Saget, 258 AD2d 641, 641-642; Leeper v Brady & Burgess Mgt. Corp., 254 AD2d 695; Andrade v Wong, 251 AD2d 609, 609-610; Lanthier v Feroleto, 237 AD2d 877, 877-878). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boler v. Malik, 267 A.D.2d 998, 700 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 998 (Boler v. Malik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

G.M.M. v. Kimpson
92 F. Supp. 3d 53 (E.D. New York, 2015)
HAMILTON, ELIJAH v. PICARDO, GEORGE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Hamilton v. Picardo
118 A.D.3d 1260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Joyner v. Durant
277 A.D.2d 1014 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Chapman v. Silber
275 A.D.2d 122 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Alexander v. Westminster Presbyterian Church
186 Misc. 2d 463 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)
Powell v. Mason
267 A.D.2d 1025 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)