Boldin v. Wingfield

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2089

DONNA FOX BOLDIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ALISON WINGFIELD; CECILEY HUSELIN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:10-cv-00010-nkm-mfu)

Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donna Fox Boldin, Appellant Pro Se. Sherwood Sunderland Day, DAY & CURRENT LAW OFFICES, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donna Fox Boldin appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Boldin v. Wingfield, No.

6:10-cv-00010-nkm-mfu (W.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED