Boldin v. Wingfield

Fourth Circuit

Boldin v. Wingfield

403 F. App'x 830

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2010·No. No. 10-2089·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donna Fox Boldin appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boldin v. Wingfield, 403 Fed.Appx. 830, 2010 WL 4950590 (W.D.Va. Sept. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donna Fox Boldin appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boldin v. Wingfield, 403 Fed.Appx. 830, 2010 WL 4950590 (W.D.Va. Sept. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Boldin v. Wingfield, 403 F. App'x 830 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

403 F. App'x 830 (Boldin v. Wingfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.