Home/Indiana Supreme Court/Bolden v. State

Bolden v. State

131 N.E.2d 301, 235 Ind. 695, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 210
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided January 19, 1956·No. 0-428·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner has again attempted an appeal to this court under Rule 2-40. The papers which he has filed contain no proper assignment of errors nor proper bill of exceptions, nor do they in any other manner comply with the provisions of Rule 2-40.

The assignment of errors constitutes petitioner’s complaint in this court. It is a requisite to any appeal, and without a proper assignment of errors no jurisdiction is conferred upon this court. Davis v. Pelley (1952), 230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N. E. 2d 910.

The petition herein is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Petition dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 131 N. E. 2d 301.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolden v. State, 131 N.E.2d 301, 235 Ind. 695, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 210 (Ind. 1956).

131 N.E.2d 301 (Bolden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hogan v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training Services
635 N.E.2d 172 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1994)
Moore v. Spann
298 N.E.2d 490 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1973)
Stamm v. PRICE
189 N.E.2d 837 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1963)
Davidson v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division
187 N.E.2d 586 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1963)
Ball Bros. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
172 N.E.2d 898 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1961)
Graue v. Brown
171 N.E.2d 705 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1961)
Anderson v. Anderson
131 N.E.2d 301 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1956)