Bolden v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Bolden v. State

131 N.E.2d 301, 235 Ind. 695, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 210

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 19, 1956

Docket0-428

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 131 N.E.2d 301 (Bolden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolden v. State, 131 N.E.2d 301, 235 Ind. 695, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 210 (Ind. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner has again attempted an appeal to this court under Rule 2-40. The papers which he has filed contain no proper assignment of errors nor proper bill of exceptions, nor do they in any other manner comply with the provisions of Rule 2-40.

The assignment of errors constitutes petitioner’s complaint in this court. It is a requisite to any appeal, and without a proper assignment of errors no jurisdiction is conferred upon this court. Davis v. Pelley (1952), 230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N. E. 2d 910.

The petition herein is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Petition dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 131 N. E. 2d 301.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI