Bolden v. State
This text of Bolden v. State (Bolden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 22-APR-2025 02:18 PM Dkt. 21 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
LEROY LEE BOLDEN, Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner LeRoy Lee Bolden’s
(1) July 11, 2024 “Motion of Inmate Complaint,” (2) July 24,
2024 “Inmate Complaint,” and (3) April 16, 2025 “Motion of
Inmate Complaint,” which the court collectively construes as a
petition for writ of mandamus, petitioner has not demonstrated a
clear and indisputable right to relief and/or a lack of
alternative means to obtain the relief sought. See Womble Bond
Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154,
1166 (2023). It is ordered that the petition is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 22, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bolden v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolden-v-state-haw-2025.