Bolden v. State
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
22-APR-2024
03:28 PM
Dkt. 11 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
LEROY LEE BOLDEN,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAIʻI,
Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Petitioner LeRoy Lee Bolden’s (1) February 28, 2024 “Motion of Inmate Complaint,” (2) March 27, 2024 “Inmate Motion of Complaint: Discriminate Against a Person,” (3) April 1, 2024 “Motion of Inmate Complaint,” and (4) April 4, 2024 “Civil Medical Inmate Complaint,” which the court collectively construes as a petition for writ of mandamus, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief and/or a lack of alternative means to obtain the
relief sought. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
It is ordered that the petition is denied.
It is further ordered that, with respect to the sealed document at Docket 9, the appellate clerk shall file a publicly- accessible redacted version of this document that omits references to petitioner’s medical information. Any individual may file a motion objecting to the sealing of this document.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 22, 2024.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bolden v. State (Bolden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.