Bogard v. State
This text of 451 So. 2d 484 (Bogard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Larry Douglas Bogard was convicted of three criminal offenses, as follows:
Count I — Aggravated Battery.
Count II — Possession of a firearm while engaged in a felony.
Count III — Aggravated Assault.
Having considered the proofs and applied the definition of “lesser included” offenses articulated in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932); in accord, Borges v. State, 415 So.2d 1265 (Fla.1983), as well as the more recent analysis in Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983), we hold that the constituent elements of Section 790.07(1), (2), Florida Statutes (1981), as charged in Count Two are sufficiently similar to those of Section 784.045(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), as charged in Count One, to here classify Count Two of the Information as a lesser included offense of that charged in Count One.
Accordingly, we affirm as to Counts One and Three, reverse as to Count Two, and remand with instructions to vacate both the conviction and sentence on Count Two.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
451 So. 2d 484, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogard-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.