Bodymedia, Inc. v. Basis Science, Inc.
This text of Bodymedia, Inc. v. Basis Science, Inc. (Bodymedia, Inc. v. Basis Science, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BODYMEDIA, INC., Appellant
v.
BASIS SCIENCE, INC., Appellee ______________________
2015-1786 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,371. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DAVID CLAY HOLLOWAY, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by RENAE WAINWRIGHT, ROBERT J. CURYLO, MICHAEL S. PAVENTO.
J. DAVID HADDEN, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by CAROLYN CHANG, AMY HAYDEN. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, LINN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 12, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bodymedia, Inc. v. Basis Science, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodymedia-inc-v-basis-science-inc-cafc-2016.