Bochner v. National Labor Relations Board

Third Circuit

Bochner v. National Labor Relations Board

180 F.2d 1021, 25 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2529, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3536

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 21, 1950

Docket10062_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 180 F.2d 1021 (Bochner v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bochner v. National Labor Relations Board, 180 F.2d 1021, 25 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2529, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3536 (3d Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined with care the briefs and the record in this case. The points involved were argued at length by able counsel. There was substantial evidence in the record to support the conclusions of the National Labor Relations Board that the petitioners coerced their employees in t'he exercise of rights guaranteed to them by Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 157, and discriminated in their employment to the end that membership in the union might be discouraged. The Board’s order is correct in every respect. A decree, in the usual form, enforcing the Board’s order in full may be submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined with care the briefs and the record in this case. The points involved were argued at length by able counsel. There was substantial evidence in the record to support the conclusions of the National Labor Relations Board that the petitioners coerced their employees in t'he exercise of rights guaranteed to them by Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 157, and discriminated in their employment to the end that membership in the union might be discouraged. The Board’s order is correct in every respect. A decree, in the usual form, enforcing the Board’s order in full may be submitted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 F.2d 1021, 25 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2529, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bochner-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca3-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack