Bob Lokey v. H. L. Richardson, Etc.

Ninth Circuit

Bob Lokey v. H. L. Richardson, Etc.

540 F.2d 1022

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 9, 1976·No. 74-1256·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Because the legal and factual considerations relevant to the decision of this case’ in light of Montanye v. Haymes, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2543, 49 L.Ed.2d-(1976), and Meachum v. Fano, -U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d-(1976), were not addressed by the parties or the district court, the summary judgment, reversed by the Court of Appeals, 9 Cir., 527 F.2d 949, with certiorari granted by the Supreme Court, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3186, 49 L.Ed.2d -, is vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with those decisions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Because the legal and factual considerations relevant to the decision of this case’ in light of Montanye v. Haymes, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2543, 49 L.Ed.2d-(1976), and Meachum v. Fano, -U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d-(1976), were not addressed by the parties or the district court, the summary judgment, reversed by the Court of Appeals, 9 Cir., 527 F.2d 949, with certiorari granted by the Supreme Court, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3186, 49 L.Ed.2d -, is vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with those decisions.

Bob Lokey v. H. L. Richardson, Etc., 540 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

540 F.2d 1022 (Bob Lokey v. H. L. Richardson, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related