Board of Trustees of the Inc. Village of Mineola v. Inc. Village of East Williston

232 A.D.2d 443, 648 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14629

Opinion

—In an action for a preliminary and permanent injunction precluding the defendant from maintaining a traffic control device in the form of a barricade upon a public street, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered March 5, 1996, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to enjoin the defendant from maintaining the barricade and denied the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A resolution concerning traffic regulations will be upheld, so long as it is reasonable and nondiscriminatory (see, People v Randazzo, 60 NY2d 952; Cohen v Board of Trustees, 198 AD2d 468; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1640 [a] [16]). Based on the facts of this case, the regulation enacted by the Incorporated Village [444] of East Willistion which provides for a traffic control device in the form of a barricade upon Sagamore Avenue at or near the Mineóla/East Williston boundary discriminates against Mineóla residents and is, therefore, invalid. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Trustees of the Inc. Village of Mineola v. Inc. Village of East Williston, 232 A.D.2d 443, 648 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

232 A.D.2d 443 (Board of Trustees of the Inc. Village of Mineola v. Inc. Village of East Williston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Randazzo
459 N.E.2d 161 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Cohen v. Board of Trustees of Inc. Village of Flower Hill
198 A.D.2d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)