Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc.
138 A.3d 609, 635 Pa. 503
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 7, 2016·No. Nos. 41 MAL 2016, 42 MAL 2016, 43 MAL 2016, 44 MAL 2016, 45 MAL 2016, 46 MAL 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[504]*504 ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is as follows: under Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, where a trial court rules on post-trial motions and expresses reliance on previously filed briefs that fully argue the post-trial issues, may an appellate court nevertheless dismiss the appeal for failure to file an accompanying brief?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc., 138 A.3d 609, 635 Pa. 503 (Pa. 2016).
138 A.3d 609 (Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Board of Supervisors of Willistown Twp. v. Main Line Gardens, Inc. and Coffman Associates, LLC
184 A.3d 615 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)