Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc.

138 A.3d 609

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 7, 2016

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 A.3d 609 (Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc., 138 A.3d 609 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[610]*610 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is as follows: under Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, where a trial court rules on post-trial motions and expresses reliance on previously filed briefs that fully argue the post-trial issues, may an appellate court nevertheless dismiss the appeal for failure to file an accompanying brief?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[610]*610 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is as follows: under Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, where a trial court rules on post-trial motions and expresses reliance on previously filed briefs that fully argue the post-trial issues, may an appellate court nevertheless dismiss the appeal for failure to file an accompanying brief?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.3d 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-supervisors-v-main-line-gardens-inc-pa-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack