Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc.

138 A.3d 609

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 7, 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[610]*610 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is as follows: under Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, where a trial court rules on post-trial motions and expresses reliance on previously filed briefs that fully argue the post-trial issues, may an appellate court nevertheless dismiss the appeal for failure to file an accompanying brief?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[610]*610 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is as follows: under Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, where a trial court rules on post-trial motions and expresses reliance on previously filed briefs that fully argue the post-trial issues, may an appellate court nevertheless dismiss the appeal for failure to file an accompanying brief?

Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc., 138 A.3d 609 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

138 A.3d 609 (Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related