Board of Education v. Davidson

210 P. 961, 190 Cal. 162, 1922 Cal. LEXIS 280
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 6, 1922
DocketS. F. No. 10250.
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 210 P. 961 (Board of Education v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Education v. Davidson, 210 P. 961, 190 Cal. 162, 1922 Cal. LEXIS 280 (Cal. 1922).

Opinion

SLOANE, J.

The petitioner is seeking by writ of mandate to compel the defendant, the Superintendent of Schools of Marin County, to call an election to choose a school board for the government of the high school of the city of San Rafael, in said county.

Prior to 1912 San Rafael was a city of the fifth class and, with some outlying contiguous territory, constituted an elementary school district. Within this district a high school was organized and maintained, thereby constituting the district a city high school district under section 1721 of the Political Code, which provides that “any city school district which has been for a period of one year preceding the taking effect of this section established and maintained as a high school within such district shall be deemed to be and constitutes a city high school district.”

Subsequently, under proceedings duly had for that purpose, the city of San Rafael adopted a municipal charter and thereafter organized and operated thereunder.

Such charter contains the following provisions relating to the organization and government of its public schools:

“Article XI. Section 1. The school department of the city of San Rafael shall comprise all the schools within the city of San Rafael, the San Rafael school district, and all territory that is now or may hereafter be annexed thereto for school purposes, which shall be known as ‘San Rafael school district, ’ and which shall succeed to all the obligations, property, rights and privileges of the San Rafael school district. It shall consist of elementary and secondary schools as now established or that may hereafter be established, and may, at the discretion of the board of education, include technical, industrial, kindergarten and night schools; provided that no school money shall be used for technical, industrial or night schools or kindergarten when such use would prevent the board of education from maintaining elementary and secondary schools as provided by law.
*164 “Section 2. All territory included within the limits of the San Eafael school district, or that may hereafter be included within such limits, but not within the city limits, shall be deemed a part of said city for the purpose of holding the general municipal elections, and shall constitute one or more separate election precincts, &nd the qualified electors therein shall vote only for members of the board of education and on questions submitted to a vote of the people at special or general elections pertaining to school matters; and said outside territory shall be deemed a part of said city for all matters connected with the school department.
“Section 6. The board of education shall have entire control and management of the public schools of the city in accordance with the constitution and general laws of the state, and is hereby vested with all the powers and charged with all the duties provided by this charter and by the general laws of the state for city boards of education.”

It will be observed that these charter sections are general in their terms as applied to elementary or high schools and became applicable in their terms to all territory then included for high school purposes within the San Rafael school district, or which might thereafter be added thereto, and provided for participation of such annexed territory in the election of a board of education and gave to such board of education entire control of all public schools in accordance with the constitution and general laws of the state.

Thereafter, under a new section of the Political Code, section 1734b, relating to high school districts, and in accordance with the provisions of said section, the board of supervisors of Marin County annexed to said San Rafael school district, for high school purposes only, several outlying elementary school districts, and the San Rafael school district was, for high school purposes, enlarged so as to include within its exterior boundaries these outlying and independent elementary school districts, which were not a part of the San Rafael elementary school district, and for elementary school purposes at least, not within the jurisdiction and control of the city board of education of San Rafael.

The question here presented is whether the school board of the city of San Rafael continues to be the governing body of the high school district, as thus enlarged, or whether, *165 as -contended by petitioner, a condition has arisen under which a separate high school board must be chosen under the state law, as contained in sections 1730, 1731 and 1732 of the Political Code. The only part of these sections important for immediate consideration is the following provision of section 1732, which reads as follows: “Whenever the number of school districts in a high school district is increased from one to two or more the superintendent of schools having jurisdiction of such high school district shall within fifteen days thereafter call an election as provided in section 1730, and thereafter the high school board shall be elected and organized as provided in sections 1730' and 1731. ’ ’ It is to this provision of law that petitioner appeals in this proceeding.

The answer is that the state school law apparently distinguishes between “high school districts in general and city high school districts.” Section 1721 of the Political Code contains this provision: “Whenever the term high school district is used it shall, unless a contrary intent appears, be deemed to include ‘union high school district,’ joint union high school districts and county high school districts. Any city school district which has been for a period of one year preceding the taking effect of this section established and maintained as a high school within such district shall be deemed to be and constitute a city high school district.” Section 1734a emphasizes this distinction as follows:

“Whenever an elementary school district is annexed under the provisions of this section in any high school district having the same boundaries as a single elementary school district, except a city high school district, such high school district shall thereafter constitute a union high school district, and shall be governed by a high school board elected according to the provisions of sections one thousand seven hundred thirty and one thousand seven hundred thirty-one of the Political Code. Prom and after the organization of the first high school board in any union high school district formed as hereinbefore provided, all property belonging to the original high school district, shall be and become the property of the union high school district so formed.

“Whenever one or more elementary school districts are annexed under the provisions of this act to a city high school district, such annexation shall be for high school purposes *166 only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marin Community College District v. Superior Court
72 Cal. App. 3d 719 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)
Gonzales v. State of California
29 Cal. App. 3d 585 (California Court of Appeal, 1972)
Hall v. City of Taft
302 P.2d 574 (California Supreme Court, 1956)
Butler v. Compton Junior College District
176 P.2d 417 (California Court of Appeal, 1947)
Gerth v. Dominguez
34 P.2d 135 (California Supreme Court, 1934)
Whitmore v. Brown
279 P. 447 (California Supreme Court, 1929)
Cloverdale Union High School District of Sonoma County v. Peters
264 P. 273 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
Esberg v. Badaracco
259 P. 730 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
Fawcett v. Ball
251 P. 679 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)
Broyles v. Mahon
237 P. 763 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
People v. San Bernardino High School District
216 P. 959 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 P. 961, 190 Cal. 162, 1922 Cal. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-v-davidson-cal-1922.