Board of Education v. Auburn Teachers Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Board of Education v. Auburn Teachers Ass'n

48 A.D.2d 761, 371 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 761 (Board of Education v. Auburn Teachers Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Board of Education v. Auburn Teachers Ass'n, 48 A.D.2d 761, 371 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The parties are directed to proceed to arbitration on the issue of whether Mary Taylor was properly evaluated as provided in article XXIII of the collective bargaining agreement between petitioner and respondent (Matter of Central School Dist. No. 2 [Livingston Manor Teachers Assn.] 44 AD2d 876). The scope of the arbitrator’s remedial authority shall be limited in accordance with Red Jacket Cent. School Dist. v Red Jacket Faculty Assn. (45 AD2d 924) and Board of Educ. of Chautauqua Cent. School Dist. v Chautauqua Cent. School Teachers Assn. (41 AD2d 47). (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term staying arbitration.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The parties are directed to proceed to arbitration on the issue of whether Mary Taylor was properly evaluated as provided in article XXIII of the collective bargaining agreement between petitioner and respondent (Matter of Central School Dist. No. 2 [Livingston Manor Teachers Assn.] 44 AD2d 876). The scope of the arbitrator’s remedial authority shall be limited in accordance with Red Jacket Cent. School Dist. v Red Jacket Faculty Assn. (45 AD2d 924) and Board of Educ. of Chautauqua Cent. School Dist. v Chautauqua Cent. School Teachers Assn. (41 AD2d 47). (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term staying arbitration.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 761, 371 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-v-auburn-teachers-assn-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack