Board of Ed. of Paris Union School Dist. No. 95 v. Vail
This text of 466 U.S. 377 (Board of Ed. of Paris Union School Dist. No. 95 v. Vail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PARIS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 95 ET AL.
v.
VAIL
Supreme Court of United States.
Thomas R. Miller argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners.
Marc J. Ansel argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.[*]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the decision of this case.
NOTES
[*] Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the American Association of University Professors by Ralph S. Brown, Lawrence White, Ann H. Franke, and Victor J. Stone; and for the National Education Association et al. by Michael H. Gottesman, Robert M. Weinberg, and Charles S. Sims.
Gwendolyn H. Gregory filed a brief for the National School Boards Association as amicus curiae.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 U.S. 377, 104 S. Ct. 2144, 80 L. Ed. 2d 377, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 64, 52 U.S.L.W. 4483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-ed-of-paris-union-school-dist-no-95-v-vail-scotus-1984.