Home/Supreme Court/Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. National Gay Task Force

Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. National Gay Task Force

470 U.S. 903, 105 S. Ct. 1858, 84 L. Ed. 2d 776, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1524, 53 U.S.L.W. 4408, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,065, 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 505
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 26, 1985
Docket83-2030
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 470 U.S. 903 (Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. National Gay Task Force) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. National Gay Task Force, 470 U.S. 903, 105 S. Ct. 1858, 84 L. Ed. 2d 776, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1524, 53 U.S.L.W. 4408, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,065, 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 505 (1985).

Opinion

470 U.S. 903 (1985)

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF OKLAHOMA CITY
v.
NATIONAL GAY TASK FORCE

No. 83-2030.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 14, 1985
Decided March 26, 1985
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Dennis W. Arrow argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Larry Lewis and James B. Croy.

Laurence H. Tribe argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were William B. Rogers and Leonard Graff.[*]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

NOTES

[*] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for Concerned Women for America Education and Legal Defense Foundation by Jordan W. Lorence; for the State of Oklahoma by Michael C. Turpen, Attorney General, and David W. Lee, Assistant Attorney General; for the National School Boards Association by Gwendolyn H. Gregory, August W. Steinhilber, and Thomas A. Shannon; and for the Washington Legal Foundation by Daniel J. Popeo, Paul D. Kamenar, and George C. Smith.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the American Association for Personal Privacy et al. by Thomas F. Coleman and Jay M. Kohorn; for the American Association of University Professors by Ann H. Franke, Ralph S. Brown, and Matthew Finkin; for the Center for Constitutional Rights et al. by Anne E. Simon, Sarah Wunsch, and Rhonda Copelon; for the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., et al. by Abby R. Rubenfeld and Rosalyn Richter; for the National Education Association et al. by Robert Chanin and Robert M. Weinberg; and for the State of New York et al. by Robert Abrams, Attorney General of New York, Robert Hermann, Solicitor General, Lawrence S. Kahn, Assistant Attorney General, and John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General of California.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Windsor v. United States
699 F.3d 169 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Sanders v. Acclaim Entertainment, Inc.
188 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (D. Colorado, 2002)
Baker v. State
744 A.2d 864 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1999)
Weaver v. Nebo School District
29 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (D. Utah, 1998)
Equality Foundation Of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City Of Cincinnati
128 F.3d 289 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)
Schulz v. New York State Executive, Pataki
960 F. Supp. 568 (N.D. New York, 1997)
Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati
860 F. Supp. 417 (S.D. Ohio, 1994)
Evans v. Romer
854 P.2d 1270 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1993)
Jantz v. Muci
976 F.2d 623 (Tenth Circuit, 1992)
Steffan v. Cheney
780 F. Supp. 1 (District of Columbia, 1991)
Jantz v. Muci
759 F. Supp. 1543 (D. Kansas, 1991)
Sergeant Perry Watkins v. United States Army
875 F.2d 699 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
Conaway v. Smith
853 F.2d 789 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
Sergeant Perry J. Watkins v. United States Army
837 F.2d 1428 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Lois E. Wren v. W. Nyles Spurlock, Hugh Simmons and Carbon County School District Number One
798 F.2d 1313 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)
Fugate v. Phoenix Civil Service Board
791 F.2d 736 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Solmitz v. Maine School Administrative District No. 59
495 A.2d 812 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)
Hardwick v. Bowers
760 F.2d 1202 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Michael Hardwick v. Michael Bowers
760 F.2d 1202 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Under 21 v. City of New York
108 A.D.2d 250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
470 U.S. 903, 105 S. Ct. 1858, 84 L. Ed. 2d 776, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1524, 53 U.S.L.W. 4408, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,065, 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-ed-of-oklahoma-city-v-national-gay-task-force-scotus-1985.