BNSF Railway Company v. Ronald Nichols

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in BNSF Railway Company v. Ronald Nichols. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 4940
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 21, 2011·No. 02-10-00375-CV·Published

Opinion

02-10-375-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00375-CV

BNSF Railway Company

APPELLANT

AND APPELLEE

V.

Ronald Nichols

APPELLEE

AND APPELLANT

------------

FROM THE 17th District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Cross-Appellant's Agreed Motion To Dismiss Cross-Appeal.”  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal of cross-appellant Ronald Nichols.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the cross-appeal shall be paid by cross-appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  April 21, 2011



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BNSF Railway Company v. Ronald Nichols, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

BNSF Railway Company v. Ronald Nichols (BNSF Railway Company v. Ronald Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.