BMO Bank NA v. Raiden LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided December 13, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-01465·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 g BMO Bank N.A., CASE NO. 23-cv-01465

9 Plaintiff, ORDER 10 “

RAIDEN, Ilc, a Washington limited liability company; and MIKHAIL GOIMAN a/k/a D MIHAI GOIMAN and the marital community composed of MIKHAIL GOIMAN and JANE or JOHN DOE GOIMAN, Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Judgment on 16 || Default by the Clerk Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1) and LCR 55(b)(3). Dkt. #29. The 17 Court DENIES the motion without prejudice. Plaintiff may submit a motion for default 18 || judgment that applies the seven factors in Eite/ v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 19 1986). 20 . Dated this 13th day of December, 2023. 21 CJoh. 4. Chas John H. Chun 23 United States District Judge 24 ORDER - 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BMO Bank NA v. Raiden LLC, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

BMO Bank NA v. Raiden LLC (BMO Bank NA v. Raiden LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCool
782 F.2d 1470 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)