Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/BLUNTSON v. Florida Parole Commission

BLUNTSON v. Florida Parole Commission

933 So. 2d 656, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11201, 2006 WL 1835433
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 6, 2006
Docket1D05-5898
StatusPublished

This text of 933 So. 2d 656 (BLUNTSON v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BLUNTSON v. Florida Parole Commission, 933 So. 2d 656, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11201, 2006 WL 1835433 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

933 So.2d 656 (2006)

Cliff BLUNTSON, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 1D05-5898.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 6, 2006.

*657 Cliff Bluntson, pro se, Petitioner.

Kim M. Fluharty, General Counsel, and Susan Schwartz, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent's motion to dismiss is granted. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
933 So. 2d 656, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11201, 2006 WL 1835433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bluntson-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2006.