Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

164 So. 3d 793, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8273, 2015 WL 3446564
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 29, 2015
DocketNo. 1D13-6004
StatusPublished

This text of 164 So. 3d 793 (Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 164 So. 3d 793, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8273, 2015 WL 3446564 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are presented with two issues in this case, the first involving jury instructions and the second concerning the availability of punitive damages for negligence and strict liability. We affirm the first issue without comment, and affirm the second based on our decision in Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 106 So.3d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), review granted, 139 So.3d 887 (Fla.2014).

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
106 So. 3d 456 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 So. 3d 793, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8273, 2015 WL 3446564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blundell-v-philip-morris-usa-inc-fladistctapp-2015.