Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

164 So. 3d 793, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8273, 2015 WL 3446564
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 2015·No. No. 1D13-6004·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are presented with two issues in this case, the first involving jury instructions and the second concerning the availability of punitive damages for negligence and strict liability. We affirm the first issue without comment, and affirm the second based on our decision in Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 106 So.3d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), review granted, 139 So.3d 887 (Fla.2014).

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 164 So. 3d 793, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8273, 2015 WL 3446564 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

164 So. 3d 793 (Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
106 So. 3d 456 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)