Blumenthal v. Tops Friendly Markets
This text of 182 A.D.2d 1105 (Blumenthal v. Tops Friendly Markets) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. [1106]*1106Memorandum: Supreme Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure (see, Matter of Love Canal Actions, 161 AD2d 1169, 1170; Sarbro Realty Corp. v Kradjian, 116 AD2d 866, 867). We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs request for discovery of information relating to other Tops employees. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Affronti, J. — Discovery.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 A.D.2d 1105, 586 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumenthal-v-tops-friendly-markets-nyappdiv-1992.