ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc.

249 A.D.2d 983, 671 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5141

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1998·Published

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in grant[984]*984ing a conditional order of protection (see, Nama Air Cargo Co. v Unitrans Consol., 208 AD2d 604, 605; see also, Oneto v Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp., 65 AD2d 520, 521). The IAS Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure (see, Blumenthal v Tops Friendly Mkts., 182 AD2d 1105, 1106; Matter of Love Canal Actions, 161 AD2d 1169, 1170). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in grant[984]*984ing a conditional order of protection (see, Nama Air Cargo Co. v Unitrans Consol., 208 AD2d 604, 605; see also, Oneto v Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp., 65 AD2d 520, 521). The IAS Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure (see, Blumenthal v Tops Friendly Mkts., 182 AD2d 1105, 1106; Matter of Love Canal Actions, 161 AD2d 1169, 1170). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc., 249 A.D.2d 983, 671 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

249 A.D.2d 983 (ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related