ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc.

249 A.D.2d 983, 671 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5141

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 983 (ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc., 249 A.D.2d 983, 671 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in grant[984]*984ing a conditional order of protection (see, Nama Air Cargo Co. v Unitrans Consol., 208 AD2d 604, 605; see also, Oneto v Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp., 65 AD2d 520, 521). The IAS Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure (see, Blumenthal v Tops Friendly Mkts., 182 AD2d 1105, 1106; Matter of Love Canal Actions, 161 AD2d 1169, 1170). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in grant[984]*984ing a conditional order of protection (see, Nama Air Cargo Co. v Unitrans Consol., 208 AD2d 604, 605; see also, Oneto v Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp., 65 AD2d 520, 521). The IAS Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure (see, Blumenthal v Tops Friendly Mkts., 182 AD2d 1105, 1106; Matter of Love Canal Actions, 161 AD2d 1169, 1170). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 983, 671 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abr-amtliches-bayerisches-reisebuero-gmbh-v-blue-bird-coach-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack