Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Gamesis, Inc.

C.D. California

Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Gamesis, Inc.

DecidedSeptember 21, 2022

Docket5:22-cv-01307

StatusUnknown

This text of Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Gamesis, Inc. (Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Gamesis, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Gamesis, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-01307-SPG-JC Document 14 Filed 09/21/22 Pagelof1 Page ID #:84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. = 5:22-cv-01307-SPG-JC Date September 21, 2022 Title Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Gamesis, Inc. et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not applicable Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before October 6, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant(s) Gamesis, Inc. and Tony S. Cheng did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer PG

CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page | of 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case 5:22-cv-01307-SPG-JC Document 14 Filed 09/21/22 Pagelof1 Page ID #:84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. = 5:22-cv-01307-SPG-JC Date September 21, 2022 Title Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Gamesis, Inc. et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not applicable Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before October 6, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant(s) Gamesis, Inc. and Tony S. Cheng did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer PG

CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page | of 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Gamesis, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumenthal-distributing-inc-v-gamesis-inc-cacd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack