Blum v. Cain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blum v. Cain

38 A.D.3d 701, 830 N.Y.S.2d 921

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered September 28, 2005, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability in favor of the defendant Town of Hempstead and against him, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The court’s charge as a whole conveyed the applicable legal principles (see Manna v Don Diego, 261 AD2d 590, 591 [1999]; Williams v City of New York, 214 NY 259, 264 [1915]; Gonzalez v City of New York, 148 AD2d 668, 670 [1989]). Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Dillon and Garni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered September 28, 2005, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability in favor of the defendant Town of Hempstead and against him, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The court’s charge as a whole conveyed the applicable legal principles (see Manna v Don Diego, 261 AD2d 590, 591 [1999]; Williams v City of New York, 214 NY 259, 264 [1915]; Gonzalez v City of New York, 148 AD2d 668, 670 [1989]). Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Dillon and Garni, JJ., concur.

Blum v. Cain, 38 A.D.3d 701, 830 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

38 A.D.3d 701 (Blum v. Cain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related