Blum Building Co. v. Ingersoll
137 A. 916, 101 N.J. Eq. 291, 16 Stock. 291, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 572
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blum Building Co. v. Ingersoll, 137 A. 916, 101 N.J. Eq. 291, 16 Stock. 291, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 572 (N.J. 1927).
137 A. 916 (Blum Building Co. v. Ingersoll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ray v. Beneficial Fin. Co.
224 A.2d 143 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Silverstein v. Abco Vending Service
117 A.2d 527 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Goetaski v. California Packing Corp.
88 A.2d 685 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Lizak v. Rottenbucher
53 A.2d 362 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Levy v. Massachusetts Accident Co.
2 A.2d 341 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1938)
Morris v. Jersey Central Power Light Co.
179 A. 683 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)