Blue Chip Coffee, Inc. v. Applebaum

128 Misc. 2d 963, 491 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1985 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3033
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 10, 1985·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert Kramer, J.

A motion was made for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213 based on a promissory note. A cross motion for reverse summary judgment was made on the ground that the note in question was usurious under applicable New York law. The reply papers indicated that during the period in question, the New York usury law (General Obligations Law § 5-501) was preempted by 12 USC § 86a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blue Chip Coffee, Inc. v. Applebaum, 128 Misc. 2d 963, 491 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1985 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3033 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1985).

128 Misc. 2d 963 (Blue Chip Coffee, Inc. v. Applebaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Omega Const. Co., Inc. v. Murray
341 N.W.2d 535 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1983)
City of New York Department of Consumer Affairs v. Coney Island Service Station
113 Misc. 2d 1012 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1982)