Blosser Co. v. Doonan

68 S.E. 1074, 8 Ga. App. 285, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 135
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 20, 1910·No. 2195·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The court erred in directing the jury to find the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, merely submitting to them the question of the amount of the recovery. Under the evidence submitted, there was an issue as to the nature of the custom sought to be established, as well as to whether sneh a custom in fact existed, and it was issuable whether a new contract of bailment was made by the parties at the conclusion of the original contract.

2. While a gratuitous bailee is,required to use some care and diligence for the safe-keeping of property entrusted to him, he must assent to the bailment, either expressly or impliedly, before the relationship of bailor and bailee will be established, with its consequent liabilities.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blosser Co. v. Doonan, 68 S.E. 1074, 8 Ga. App. 285, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 135 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

68 S.E. 1074 (Blosser Co. v. Doonan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davidson v. Ramsby
210 S.E.2d 245 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Goodyear Clearwater Mills v. Wheeler
49 S.E.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Southeastern Fair Asso. v. Ford
14 S.E.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Scott's v. Chesterman
85 S.E. 502 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1915)