Bloss v. Federated Publications, Inc.

157 N.W.2d 241, 380 Mich. 485, 1968 Mich. LEXIS 161
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 1, 1968
DocketCalendar 36, Docket 51,654
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 157 N.W.2d 241 (Bloss v. Federated Publications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloss v. Federated Publications, Inc., 157 N.W.2d 241, 380 Mich. 485, 1968 Mich. LEXIS 161 (Mich. 1968).

Opinions

Black, J.

I vote to affirm. As pointed out by Division 3, 5 Mich App 74, all authoritative precedent, opposed only by a decision made in 1919 by a nisi prius court, Uhlman v. Sherman, 22 Ohio. NP (NS) 225 (31 Ohio Dec 54), rules that the business of publishing a newspaper is a strictly private enterprise and that the publisher thereof is under no legal obligation to sell advertising to all who would buy it.

Plaintiff’s derivative contention, that the defendant publisher has actionably discriminated against him,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herald Telephone v. Fatouros
431 N.E.2d 171 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1982)
Newspaper Printing Corp. v. Galbreath
580 S.W.2d 777 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1979)
PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.
321 N.E.2d 915 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)
Bloss v. Federated Publications, Inc.
157 N.W.2d 241 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 N.W.2d 241, 380 Mich. 485, 1968 Mich. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloss-v-federated-publications-inc-mich-1968.